↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of biomarker-based exclusion of ventilator-acquired pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use (VAPrapid-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of biomarker-based exclusion of ventilator-acquired pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use (VAPrapid-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1442-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas P. Hellyer, Niall H. Anderson, Jennie Parker, Paul Dark, Tina Van Den Broeck, Suveer Singh, Ronan McMullan, Ashley M. Agus, Lydia M. Emerson, Bronagh Blackwood, Savita Gossain, Tim S. Walsh, Gavin D. Perkins, Andrew Conway Morris, Daniel F. McAuley, A. John Simpson

Abstract

Ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) is a common reason for antimicrobial therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Biomarker-based diagnostics could improve antimicrobial stewardship through rapid exclusion of VAP. Bronchoalveloar lavage (BAL) fluid biomarkers have previously been shown to allow the exclusion of VAP with high confidence. This is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial to determine whether a rapid biomarker-based exclusion of VAP results in fewer antibiotics and improved antimicrobial management. Patients with clinically suspected VAP undergo BAL, and VAP is confirmed by growth of a potential pathogen at > 10(4) colony-forming units per millilitre (CFU/ml). Patients are randomised 1:1, to either a 'biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics' in which BAL fluid is tested for IL-1β and IL-8 in addition to routine microbiology testing, or to 'routine use of antibiotics' in which BAL undergoes routine microbiology testing only. Clinical teams are blinded to intervention until 6 hours after randomisation, when biomarker results are reported to the clinician. The primary outcome is a change in the frequency distribution of antibiotic-free days (AFD) in the 7 days following BAL. Secondary outcome measures include antibiotic use at 14 and 28 days; ventilator-free days; 28-day mortality and ICU mortality; sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) at days 3, 7 and 14; duration of stay in critical care and the hospital; antibiotic-associated infections; and antibiotic-resistant pathogen cultures up to hospital discharge, death or 56 days. A healthcare-resource-utilisation analysis will be calculated from the duration of critical care and hospital stay. In addition, safety data will be collected with respect to performing BAL. A sample size of 210 will be required to detect a clinically significant shift in the distribution of AFD towards more patients having fewer antibiotics and therefore more AFD. This trial will test whether a rapid biomarker-based exclusion of VAP results in rapid discontinuation of antibiotics and therefore improves antibiotic management in patients with suspected VAP. ISRCTN65937227 . Registered on 22 August 2013. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01972425 . Registered on 24 October 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 41 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 41 35%