↓ Skip to main content

Proteorhodopsin genes in giant viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proteorhodopsin genes in giant viruses
Published in
Biology Direct, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-7-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalya Yutin, Eugene V Koonin

Abstract

Viruses with large genomes encode numerous proteins that do not directly participate in virus biogenesis but rather modify key functional systems of infected cells. We report that a distinct group of giant viruses infecting unicellular eukaryotes that includes Organic Lake Phycodnaviruses and Phaeocystis globosa virus encode predicted proteorhodopsins that have not been previously detected in viruses. Search of metagenomic sequence data shows that putative viral proteorhodopsins are extremely abundant in marine environments. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that giant viruses acquired proteorhodopsins via horizontal gene transfer from proteorhodopsin-encoding protists although the actual donor(s) could not be presently identified. The pattern of conservation of the predicted functionally important amino acid residues suggests that viral proteorhodopsin homologs function as sensory rhodopsins. We hypothesize that viral rhodopsins modulate light-dependent signaling, in particular phototaxis, in infected protists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 141 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Environmental Science 14 9%
Chemistry 5 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#263
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,672
of 191,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.