You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Visualizing the third dimension in virtual training environments for neurologically impaired persons: beneficial or disruptive?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-9-73 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wouter van den Hoogen, Peter Feys, Ilse Lamers, Karin Coninx, Sofie Notelaers, Lore Kerkhofs, Wijnand IJsselsteijn |
| Abstract |
Many contemporary systems for neurorehabilitation utilize 3D virtual environments (VEs) that allow for training patients' hand or arm movements. In the current paper we comparatively test the effectiveness of two characteristics of VEs in rehabilitation training when utilizing a 3D haptic interaction device: Stereo Visualization (monoscopic vs stereoscopic image presentation) and Graphic Environment (2.5D vs 3D). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Psychology | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,186,806
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#514
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,277
of 191,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.