↓ Skip to main content

Investigating a cluster of vulvar cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study of genital human papillomavirus prevalence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating a cluster of vulvar cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study of genital human papillomavirus prevalence
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice R Rumbold, Sarah E Tan, John R Condon, Debbie Taylor-Thomson, Maria Nickels, Sepehr N Tabrizi, Margaret LJ Davy, Margaret M O’Brien, Christine M Connors, Ibrahim Zardawi, Jim Stankovich, Suzanne M Garland

Abstract

Vulvar cancer is a relatively rare malignancy, which occurs most often in postmenopausal women. We have previously identified a geographic cluster of vulvar cancer in young Indigenous women living in remote communities in the Arnhem Land region of Australia. In this population, we investigated the prevalence of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in anogenital samples (vulvar/vaginal/perianal area and cervix) and compared the overall, type-specific and multiple infection prevalence between sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 27%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2012.
All research outputs
#16,099,609
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,648
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,659
of 174,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#57
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.