↓ Skip to main content

Hippocampal lesions facilitate instrumental learning with delayed reinforcement but induce impulsive choice in rats

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
pinterest
1 Pinner

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hippocampal lesions facilitate instrumental learning with delayed reinforcement but induce impulsive choice in rats
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, May 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-6-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy HC Cheung, Rudolf N Cardinal

Abstract

Animals must frequently act to influence the world even when the reinforcing outcomes of their actions are delayed. Learning with action-outcome delays is a complex problem, and little is known of the neural mechanisms that bridge such delays. When outcomes are delayed, they may be attributed to (or associated with) the action that caused them, or mistakenly attributed to other stimuli, such as the environmental context. Consequently, animals that are poor at forming context-outcome associations might learn action-outcome associations better with delayed reinforcement than normal animals. The hippocampus contributes to the representation of environmental context, being required for aspects of contextual conditioning. We therefore hypothesized that animals with hippocampal lesions would be better than normal animals at learning to act on the basis of delayed reinforcement. We tested the ability of hippocampal-lesioned rats to learn a free-operant instrumental response using delayed reinforcement, and what is potentially a related ability -- the ability to exhibit self-controlled choice, or to sacrifice an immediate, small reward in order to obtain a delayed but larger reward.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 183 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Student > Master 38 19%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 25%
Neuroscience 40 20%
Psychology 36 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 31 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,734,103
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#654
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,425
of 58,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.