You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Niche differentiation of two sympatric species of Microdochium colonizing the roots of common reed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-11-242 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Ernst, Karin Neubert, Kurt W Mendgen, Stefan GR Wirsel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 30% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,103,736
of 25,235,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#240
of 3,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,051
of 146,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.