You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-12-196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sylvia A Stegeman, Mireille de Jong, Cornelis FM Sier, Pieta Krijnen, Jan W Duijff, Tom PH van Thiel, Piet AR de Rijcke, Nicolaj MR Soesman, Tjebbe Hagenaars, Freek D Boekhoudt, Mark R de Vries, Gert R Roukema, Andras FK Tanka, Jephta van den Bremer, Hub GWM van der Meulen, Maarten WGA Bronkhorst, Bart A van Dijkman, Stephan WAM van Zutphen, Dagmar I Vos, Niels WL Schep, Martin G Eversdijk, Ger DJ van Olden, Johan GH van den Brand, Robert Jan Hillen, Jan Paul M Frölke, Inger B Schipper |
| Abstract |
The traditional view that the vast majority of midshaft clavicular fractures heal with good functional outcomes following non-operative treatment may be no longer valid for all midshaft clavicular fractures. Recent studies have presented a relatively high incidence of non-union and identified speciic limitations of the shoulder function in subgroups of patients with these injuries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,316,001
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,114
of 4,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,238
of 124,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#49
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.