You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra McKeown, Zuhaib M. Mir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 12 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 14% |
| Spain | 11 | 13% |
| United States | 9 | 10% |
| Colombia | 5 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 15% |
| Scientists | 12 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 60 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 65 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#691,250
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#82
of 2,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,994
of 532,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.