You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standardizing fatigue-resistance testing during electrical stimulation of paralysed human quadriceps muscles, a practical approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00805-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Schmoll, Ronan Le Guillou, David Lobato Borges, Charles Fattal, Emerson Fachin-Martins, Christine Azevedo Coste |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#13,375,643
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#619
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,968
of 503,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.