You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementing a simplified neonatal resuscitation protocol-helping babies breathe at birth (HBB) - at a tertiary level hospital in Nepal for an increased perinatal survival
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-159 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ashish KC, Mats Målqvist, Johan Wrammert, Sheela Verma, Dhan Raj Aryal, Robert Clark, Naresh P KC, Ravi Vitrakoti, Kedar Baral, Uwe Ewald |
Abstract |
Reducing neonatal death has been an emerging challenge in low and middle income countries in the past decade. The development of the low cost interventions and their effective delivery are needed to reduce deaths from birth asphyxia. This study will assess the impact of a simplified neonatal resuscitation protocol provided by Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) at a tertiary hospital in Nepal. Perinatal outcomes and performance of skilled birth attendants on management of intrapartum-related neonatal hypoxia will be the main measurements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 124 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
Researcher | 20 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2012.
All research outputs
#19,292,491
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,451
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,205
of 174,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#37
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.