You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A method to screen and evaluate tissue adhesives for joint repair applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tilo Dehne, Rolf Zehbe, Jan Philipp Krüger, Aneliya Petrova, Rafael Valbuena, Michael Sittinger, Helmut Schubert, Jochen Ringe |
| Abstract |
Tissue adhesives are useful means for various medical procedures. Since varying requirements cause that a single adhesive cannot meet all needs, bond strength testing remains one of the key applications used to screen for new products and study the influence of experimental variables. This study was conducted to develop an easy to use method to screen and evaluate tissue adhesives for tissue engineering applications. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,611
of 4,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,930
of 170,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#58
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.