↓ Skip to main content

Dental pulp stem cells can improve muscle dysfunction in animal models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dental pulp stem cells can improve muscle dysfunction in animal models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13287-020-02099-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuko Nitahara-Kasahara, Mutsuki Kuraoka, Posadas Herrera Guillermo, Hiromi Hayashita-Kinoh, Yasunobu Maruoka, Aki Nakamura-Takahasi, Koichi Kimura, Shin’ichi Takeda, Takashi Okada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,665,271
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,380
of 2,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,191
of 505,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#56
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.