↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: Hemorrhagic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
26 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
484 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
745 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: Hemorrhagic shock
Published in
Critical Care, April 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Gutierrez, HDavid Reines, Marian E Wulf-Gutierrez

Abstract

This review addresses the pathophysiology and treatment of hemorrhagic shock - a condition produced by rapid and significant loss of intravascular volume, which may lead sequentially to hemodynamic instability, decreases in oxygen delivery, decreased tissue perfusion, cellular hypoxia, organ damage, and death. Hemorrhagic shock can be rapidly fatal. The primary goals are to stop the bleeding and to restore circulating blood volume. Resuscitation may well depend on the estimated severity of hemorrhage. It now appears that patients with moderate hypotension from bleeding may benefit by delaying massive fluid resuscitation until they reach a definitive care facility. On the other hand, the use of intravenous fluids, crystalloids or colloids, and blood products can be life saving in those patients who are in severe hemorrhagic shock. The optimal method of resuscitation has not been clearly established. A hemoglobin level of 7-8 g/dl appears to be an appropriate threshold for transfusion in critically ill patients with no evidence of tissue hypoxia. However, maintaining a higher hemoglobin level of 10 g/dl is a reasonable goal in actively bleeding patients, the elderly, or individuals who are at risk for myocardial infarction. Moreover, hemoglobin concentration should not be the only therapeutic guide in actively bleeding patients. Instead, therapy should be aimed at restoring intravascular volume and adequate hemodynamic parameters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 745 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 716 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 115 15%
Student > Postgraduate 97 13%
Student > Master 75 10%
Other 69 9%
Researcher 65 9%
Other 170 23%
Unknown 154 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 367 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 5%
Engineering 31 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 3%
Other 67 9%
Unknown 171 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#390,113
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#213
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370
of 65,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.