↓ Skip to main content

Use of manual and powered wheelchair in children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of manual and powered wheelchair in children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-10-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabet Rodby-Bousquet, Gunnar Hägglund

Abstract

Mobility is important for the cognitive and psychosocial development of children. Almost one third of children with cerebral palsy (CP) are non-ambulant. Wheelchairs can provide independent mobility, allowing them to explore their environment. Independent mobility is vital for activity and participation and reduces the dependence on caregivers. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of manual and powered wheelchair indoors and outdoors in relation to the degree of independent wheelchair mobility or need for assistance in a total population of children with CP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Engineering 18 10%
Design 6 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,320,615
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,196
of 3,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,846
of 82,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.