You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Testing the activitystat hypothesis: a randomised controlled trial protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-851 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sjaan Gomersall, Carol Maher, Kevin Norton, Jim Dollman, Grant Tomkinson, Adrian Esterman, Coralie English, Nicole Lewis, Tim Olds |
Abstract |
The activitystat hypothesis proposes that when physical activity or energy expenditure is increased or decreased in one domain, there will be a compensatory change in another domain to maintain an overall, stable level of physical activity or energy expenditure. To date, there has been no experimental study primarily designed to test the activitystat hypothesis in adults. The aim of this trial is to determine the effect of two different imposed exercise loads on total daily energy expenditure and physical activity levels. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Singapore | 1 | 1% |
Tunisia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 12% |
Psychology | 6 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,608,631
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,723
of 14,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,409
of 172,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#224
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.