You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of an Agar-gel Technique for Large Scale Application to Recover Ascaris suum Larvae from Intestinal Contents of Pigs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, September 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bf03548483 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H.-C. Slotved, E. H. Barnes, L. Eriksen, A. Roepstorff, P. Nansen, H. Bjørn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2011.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#185
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,312
of 28,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them