You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-production in local government: process, codification and capacity building of new knowledge in collective reflection spaces. Workshops findings from a UK mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-021-00677-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter van der Graaf, Mandy Cheetham, Sam Redgate, Clare Humble, Ashley Adamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 60% |
| Ireland | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 36% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 32% |
| Scientists | 8 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,341,318
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#305
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,672
of 537,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.