You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Virtual barriers: unpacking the sustainability implications of online food spaces and the Yellowknife Farmers Market’s response to COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00664-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josalyn Radcliffe, Kelly Skinner, Andrew Spring, Lise Picard, France Benoit, Warren Dodd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 9 | 56% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,147,309
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#323
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,750
of 536,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 536,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.