↓ Skip to main content

Potential effect modification of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy by household socio-economic status

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential effect modification of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy by household socio-economic status
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-10294-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephaney Gyaase, Kwaku Poku Asante, Elisha Adeniji, Owusu Boahen, Matthew Cairns, Seth Owusu-Agyei

Abstract

In the phase III RTS,S /AS01 trial, significant heterogeneity in efficacy of the vaccine across study sites was seen. Question on whether variations in socio - economic status (SES) of participant contributed to the heterogeinity of the vaccine efficacy (VE) remains unknown. Data from the Phase III RTS,S /AS01 trial in children aged 5-17 months in Kintampo were re-analysed. SES of each child was derived from the Kintampo Health and Demographic Surveillance System, using principal component analysis of household assets. Extended Cox regression was used to estimate the interaction between RTS,S/AS01 VE and household SES. Protective efficacy of the RTS,S/AS0 vaccine significantly varied by participant's household SES, thus increase in household SES was associated with an increase in protective efficacy (P-value = 0.0041). Effect modification persisted after adjusting for age at first vaccination, gender, distance from community to the health facility, child's haemoglobin level, household size, place of residence and mothers' educational level. Household SES may be a proxy for malaria transmission intensity. The study showed a significant modification of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine efficacy by the different levels of child's household socio - economic status. Efficacy of GSK Biologicals' candidate malaria vaccine (25049) against malaria disease in infants and children in Africa. NCT00866619 prospectively registered on 20 March 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 20 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 22 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,836,670
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,149
of 15,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,730
of 505,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#292
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.