You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Control of COVID-19 in Australia through quarantine: the role of special health accommodation (SHA) in New South Wales, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-10244-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Penelope Fotheringham, Teresa Anderson, Miranda Shaw, Joseph Jewitt, Hannah Storey, Owen Hutchings, Jason Cartwright, Leena Gupta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Librarian | 4 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 80 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,784,886
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,667
of 17,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,025
of 528,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#95
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.