You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why do healthcare professionals fail to escalate as per the early warning system (EWS) protocol? A qualitative evidence synthesis of the barriers and facilitators of escalation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Emergency Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12873-021-00403-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. M. O’Neill, B. Clyne, M. Bell, A. Casey, B. Leen, S. M. Smith, M. Ryan, M. O’Neill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 12 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 29% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,734,193
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#41
of 889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,932
of 537,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.