You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multilayered post-GWAS assessment on genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-020-00816-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evangelina López de Maturana, Juan Antonio Rodríguez, Lola Alonso, Oscar Lao, Esther Molina-Montes, Isabel Adoración Martín-Antoniano, Paulina Gómez-Rubio, Rita Lawlor, Alfredo Carrato, Manuel Hidalgo, Mar Iglesias, Xavier Molero, Matthias Löhr, Christopher Michalski, José Perea, Michael O’Rorke, Victor Manuel Barberà, Adonina Tardón, Antoni Farré, Luís Muñoz-Bellvís, Tanja Crnogorac-Jurcevic, Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz, Thomas Gress, William Greenhalf, Linda Sharp, Luís Arnes, Lluís Cecchini, Joaquim Balsells, Eithne Costello, Lucas Ilzarbe, Jörg Kleeff, Bo Kong, Mirari Márquez, Josefina Mora, Damian O’Driscoll, Aldo Scarpa, Weimin Ye, Jingru Yu, Montserrat García-Closas, Manolis Kogevinas, Nathaniel Rothman, Debra T Silverman, Demetrius Albanes, Alan A Arslan, Laura Beane-Freeman, Paige M Bracci, Paul Brennan, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Julie Buring, Federico Canzian, Margaret Du, Steve Gallinger, J Michael Gaziano, Phyllis J Goodman, Marc Gunter, Loic LeMarchand, Donghui Li, Rachael E Neale, Ulrika Peters, Gloria M Petersen, Harvey A Risch, Maria José Sánchez, Xiao-Ou Shu, Mark D Thornquist, Kala Visvanathan, Wei Zheng, Stephen J Chanock, Douglas Easton, Brian M Wolpin, Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon, Alison P Klein, Laufey T Amundadottir, Marc A Marti-Renom, Francisco X Real, Núria Malats |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 73% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,275,123
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#724
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,183
of 505,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#21
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.