↓ Skip to main content

Developing the Diagnostic Adherence to Medication Scale (the DAMS) for use in clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing the Diagnostic Adherence to Medication Scale (the DAMS) for use in clinical practice
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Garfield, Lina Eliasson, Sarah Clifford, Alan Willson, Nick Barber

Abstract

There is a need for an adherence measure, to monitor adherence services in clinical practice, which can distinguish between different types of non-adherence and measure changes over time. In order to be inclusive of all patients it needs to be able to be administered to both patients and carers and to be suitable for patients taking multiple medications for a range of clinical conditions. A systematic review found that no adherence measure met all these criteria. We therefore wished to develop a theory based adherence scale (the DAMS) and establish its content, face and preliminary construct validity in a primary care population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,915,761
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,390
of 7,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,121
of 172,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#41
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.