↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative study into the use of formal services for dementia by carers from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A qualitative study into the use of formal services for dementia by carers from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Shanley, Desiree Boughtwood, Jon Adams, Yvonne Santalucia, Helena Kyriazopoulos, Dimity Pond, Jeffrey Rowland

Abstract

People with dementia and their family carers need to be able to access formal services in the community to help maintain their wellbeing and independence. While knowing about and navigating one's way through service systems is difficult for most people, it is particularly difficult for people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities. This study addresses a lack of literature on the use of formal services for dementia by people from CALD backgrounds by examining the experiences and perceptions of dementia caregiving within four CALD communities - Italian, Chinese, Spanish and Arabic-speaking - in south western Sydney, Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 24%
Psychology 23 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,253,344
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,525
of 7,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,173
of 172,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#82
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.