↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of evolutionary algorithms in gene regulatory network model inference

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of evolutionary algorithms in gene regulatory network model inference
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-11-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alina Sîrbu, Heather J Ruskin, Martin Crane

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Germany 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
France 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 106 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 28%
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 42 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Engineering 9 7%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,359
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,385
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,805
of 165,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#39
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.