You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41512-021-00092-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lijing Lin, Matthew Sperrin, David A. Jenkins, Glen P. Martin, Niels Peek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 22% |
| United States | 9 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 50% |
| Scientists | 24 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,182,545
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#10
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,746
of 528,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.