You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guidelines and best practice recommendations on reproductive health services provision amid COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-10346-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lemi Belay Tolu, Garumma Tolu Feyissa, Wondimu Gudu Jeldu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ethiopia | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Ireland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
Researcher | 18 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
Other | 29 | 13% |
Unknown | 109 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
Other | 20 | 9% |
Unknown | 115 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,396,946
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,951
of 16,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,706
of 519,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#123
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.