↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy T Wang, Rebecca J Mullan, Melanie A Lane, Ahmad Hazem, Chaithra Prasad, Nicola W Gathaiya, M Mercè Fernández-Balsells, Amy Bagatto, Fernando Coto-Yglesias, Jantey Carey, Tarig A Elraiyah, Patricia J Erwin, Gunjan Y Gandhi, Victor M Montori, Mohammad Hassan Murad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Chemistry 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,397,477
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#641
of 2,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,275
of 167,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.