↓ Skip to main content

CCR5 ameliorates Japanese encephalitis via dictating the equilibrium of regulatory CD4+Foxp3+ T and IL-17+CD4+ Th17 cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CCR5 ameliorates Japanese encephalitis via dictating the equilibrium of regulatory CD4+Foxp3+ T and IL-17+CD4+ Th17 cells
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12974-016-0656-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Hyoung Kim, Ajit Mahadev Patil, Jin Young Choi, Seong Bum Kim, Erdenebelig Uyangaa, Ferdaus Mohd Altaf Hossain, Sang-Youel Park, John Hwa Lee, Seong Kug Eo

Abstract

CCR5 is a CC chemokine receptor involved in the migration of effector leukocytes including macrophages, NK, and T cells into inflamed tissues. Also, the role of CCR5 in CD4(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cell (Treg) homing has recently begun to grab attention. Japanese encephalitis (JE) is defined as severe neuroinflammation of the central nervous system (CNS) following infection with mosquito-borne flavivirus JE virus. However, the potential contribution of CCR5 to JE progression via mediating CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Treg homing has not been investigated. Infected wild-type (Ccr5(+/+)) and CCR5-deficient (Ccr5(-/-)) mice were examined daily for mortality and clinical signs, and neuroinflammation in the CNS was evaluated by infiltration of inflammatory leukocytes and cytokine expression. In addition, viral burden, NK- and JEV-specific T cell responses were analyzed. Adoptive transfer of CCR5(+)CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs was used to evaluate the role of Tregs in JE progression. CCR5 ablation exacerbated JE without altering viral burden in the extraneural and CNS tissues, as manifested by increased CNS infiltration of Ly-6C(hi) monocytes and Ly-6G(hi) granulocytes. Compared to Ccr5(+/+) mice, Ccr5(-/-) mice unexpectedly showed increased responses of IFN-γ(+)NK and CD8(+) T cells in the spleen, but not CD4(+) T cells. More interestingly, CCR5-ablation resulted in a skewed response to IL-17(+)CD4(+) Th17 cells and correspondingly reduced CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs in the spleen and brain, which was closely associated with exacerbated JE. Our results also revealed that adoptive transfer of sorted CCR5(+)CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs into Ccr5(-/-) mice could ameliorate JE progression without apparently altering the viral burden and CNS infiltration of IL-17(+)CD4(+) Th17 cells, myeloid-derived Ly-6C(hi) monocytes and Ly-6G(hi) granulocytes. Instead, adoptive transfer of CCR5(+)CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs into Ccr5(-/-) mice resulted in increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-β) in the spleen and brain, and transferred CCR5(+) Tregs were found to produce IL-10. CCR5 regulates JE progression via governing timely and appropriate CNS infiltration of CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs, thereby facilitating host survival. Therefore, this critical and extended role of CCR5 in JE raises possible safety concerns regarding the use of CCR5 antagonists in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals who inhabit regions in which both HIV and flaviviruses, such as JEV and West Nile virus, are endemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,092,428
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,640
of 2,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,728
of 379,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#43
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.