You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Abnormal cerebellar volume in somatic vs. non-somatic delusional disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cerebellum & Ataxias, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40673-020-0111-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua Krämer, Markus Huber, Christina Mundinger, Mike M. Schmitgen, Roger Pycha, Erwin Kirchler, Christian Macina, Martin Karner, Dusan Hirjak, Katharina M. Kubera, Malte S. Depping, Dmitry Romanov, Roland W. Freudenmann, Robert Christian Wolf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 4 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,284,124
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Cerebellum & Ataxias
#10
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,365
of 457,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebellum & Ataxias
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them