You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of multiplex meta analysis techniques for understanding the acute rejection of solid organ transplants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-11-s9-s6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander A Morgan, Purvesh Khatri, Richard Hayden Jones, Minnie M Sarwal, Atul J Butte |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,645,091
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,070
of 7,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,092
of 100,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.