↓ Skip to main content

Virally associated arthritis 2008: clinical, epidemiologic, and pathophysiologic considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Virally associated arthritis 2008: clinical, epidemiologic, and pathophysiologic considerations
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/ar2480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Vassilopoulos, Leonard H Calabrese

Abstract

Several viruses have been associated with the development of inflammatory arthritis, including the hepatitis viruses (hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus), HIV, the parvovirus B19, the human T-cell lymphotropic virus-I, and the alphaviruses. Here, we review the epidemiology, the pathophysiological mechanisms, the pertinent clinical and laboratory findings as well as the principles of therapy of the most common virus-associated arthritides. We believe that the knowledge of these key diagnostic and therapeutic features of virus-associated arthritides is important for the rheumatologist of the 21st century.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 17%
Student > Master 10 17%
Professor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,088,782
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#353
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,707
of 98,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.