You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii as a live vaccine vector in susceptible and resistant hosts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-3305-4-168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Zou, Xiao-Xi Huang, Guang-Wen Yin, Ye Ding, Xian-Yong Liu, Heng Wang, Qi-Jun Chen, Xun Suo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Estonia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 39% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,351,643
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#738
of 5,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,278
of 125,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.