You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of a solid matrix for collection and ambient storage of RNA from whole blood
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Clinical Pathology, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6890-14-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heng Tao, Philip Beineke, Bing Li, William Alberts, Steven Rosenberg, Erik Kvam, James A Wingrove |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 42% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Chemistry | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,731,211
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Clinical Pathology
#34
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,941
of 228,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Clinical Pathology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.