↓ Skip to main content

Histological staining methods preparatory to laser capture microdissection significantly affect the integrity of the cellular RNA

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histological staining methods preparatory to laser capture microdissection significantly affect the integrity of the cellular RNA
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-7-97
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongyang Wang, James D Owens, Joanna H Shih, Ming-Chung Li, Robert F Bonner, J Frederic Mushinski

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 96 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 36%
Researcher 39 36%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 6 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,645,563
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,654
of 10,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,504
of 66,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,737 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.