↓ Skip to main content

Supplement use in sport: is there a potentially dangerous incongruence between rationale and practice?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supplement use in sport: is there a potentially dangerous incongruence between rationale and practice?
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1745-6673-2-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Petróczi, Declan P Naughton

Abstract

Supplement use by athletes is complex and research supports the alarming notion of misinformed decisions regarding supplements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 23%
Student > Master 13 21%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#229
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,303
of 82,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them