↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic differentiation between wild and domesticated varieties of Crescentia cujeteL. and culturally relevant uses of their fruits as bowls in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic differentiation between wild and domesticated varieties of Crescentia cujeteL. and culturally relevant uses of their fruits as bowls in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xitlali Aguirre-Dugua, Edgar Pérez-Negrón, Alejandro Casas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,645,563
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#326
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,109
of 213,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.