You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Empirical evaluation of scoring functions for Bayesian network model selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-13-s15-s14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhifa Liu, Brandon Malone, Changhe Yuan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 31 | 32% |
| Engineering | 20 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,666,906
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,463
of 7,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,566
of 169,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#60
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.