↓ Skip to main content

Designing an information technology system in public health: observations from India

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Proceedings, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Designing an information technology system in public health: observations from India
Published in
BMC Proceedings, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1753-6561-6-s5-o19
Authors

Sundararaman Thiagarajan, Pankaj Gupta, Amit Mishra, Itisha Vasisht, Alia Kauser, Dilip Singh Mairembam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Other 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Social Sciences 8 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#265
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,757
of 172,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.