↓ Skip to main content

Reproducible Clusters from Microarray Research: Whither?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducible Clusters from Microarray Research: Whither?
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-6-s2-s10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikhil R Garge, Grier P Page, Alan P Sprague, Bernard S Gorman, David B Allison

Abstract

In cluster analysis, the validity of specific solutions, algorithms, and procedures present significant challenges because there is no null hypothesis to test and no 'right answer'. It has been noted that a replicable classification is not necessarily a useful one, but a useful one that characterizes some aspect of the population must be replicable. By replicable we mean reproducible across multiple samplings from the same population. Methodologists have suggested that the validity of clustering methods should be based on classifications that yield reproducible findings beyond chance levels. We used this approach to determine the performance of commonly used clustering algorithms and the degree of replicability achieved using several microarray datasets.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 8%
Australia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 53 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 37%
Computer Science 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 7 11%