↓ Skip to main content

Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12885-021-07867-9
Authors

Chen, Dongni, Wang, Weidong, Mo, Junxian, Ren, Qiannan, Miao, Huikai, Chen, Youfang, Wen, Zhesheng

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#16,477,273
of 18,623,929 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,258
of 6,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,700
of 357,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,623,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,750 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them