You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01598-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Qi Koh, Simone Anna Felding, Elaine Toomey, Dympna Casey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,693,162
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#487
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,388
of 505,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#15
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.