You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness and harms of clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01596-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Regina Visca, Nicole George, Sara Ahmed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 63% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 23 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 26 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,363,360
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,183
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,640
of 512,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#45
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.