↓ Skip to main content

Lymphoedema: Pathophysiology and management in resource-poor settings - relevance for lymphatic filariasis control programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Filaria Journal, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lymphoedema: Pathophysiology and management in resource-poor settings - relevance for lymphatic filariasis control programmes
Published in
Filaria Journal, March 2003
DOI 10.1186/1475-2883-2-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babar Vaqas, Terence J Ryan

Abstract

Low cost reduction of morbidity in lymphoedema is an essential goal in the management of lymphatic filariasis. This review emphasises the role of movement and elevation, and refers to the literature on the effects of these on the venous and lymphatic system. The patient with lymphoedema becomes increasingly immobile and the affected limb is often in a permanently dependent position causing venous hypertension and resultant overloading of the failing lymphatics. The evidence that breathing exercises are important for reducing venous hypertension and inducing lymphatic flow is discussed.The contribution of a damaged epidermis to lymphatic failure is emphasised. Loss of barrier function encourages penetration of bacteria and stimulates repair mechanisms that generate cytokines, which, in turn lead to inflammation. Management programmes that improve the health of the epidermis play a part in reducing lymphatic load.In taking morbidity management of lymphoedema into the general health services there are benefits in promoting skin hygiene and self-help regimes that can ameliorate many diseases along with lymphoedema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,615,224
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Filaria Journal
#27
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,506
of 62,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Filaria Journal
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.