You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Survey of n- 3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in fish and fish products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lipids in Health and Disease, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-511x-11-144 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia Strobel, Gerhard Jahreis, Katrin Kuhnt |
| Abstract |
The imbalance of the n-3/n-6 ratio in the Western diet is characterised by a low intake of n-3 long-chain (LC) PUFA and a concurrent high intake of n-6 PUFA. Fish, in particular marine fish, is a unique source of n-3 LC PUFA. However, FA composition of consumed fish changed, due to the increasing usage of n-6 PUFA-rich vegetable oils in aquaculture feed and in fish processing (frying) which both lead to a further shift in n-6 PUFA to the detriment of n-3 LC PUFA.The aim of this study was to determine the ratio of n-3/n-6 including the contents of EPA and DHA in fish fillets and fish products from the German market (n=123). Furthermore, the study focussed on the FA content in farmed salmon compared to wild salmon as well as in processed Alaska pollock fillet, e.g., fish fingers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Japan | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 13% |
| Researcher | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 84 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 102 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,205,125
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#86
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,326
of 202,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.