You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-591 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gro Nilsen, Knut Liestøl, Peter Van Loo, Hans Kristian Moen Vollan, Marianne B Eide, Oscar M Rueda, Suet-Feung Chin, Roslin Russell, Lars O Baumbusch, Carlos Caldas, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Ole Christian Lingjærde |
| Abstract |
Cancer progression is associated with genomic instability and an accumulation of gains and losses of DNA. The growing variety of tools for measuring genomic copy numbers, including various types of array-CGH, SNP arrays and high-throughput sequencing, calls for a coherent framework offering unified and consistent handling of single- and multi-track segmentation problems. In addition, there is a demand for highly computationally efficient segmentation algorithms, due to the emergence of very high density scans of copy number. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Chile | 1 | 20% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 20% |
| Peru | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Norway | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,812,055
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#369
of 11,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,938
of 205,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#2
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.