You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-217x-2-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Zhou, Yiyuan Li, Shanlin Liu, Qing Yang, Xu Su, Lili Zhou, Min Tang, Ribei Fu, Jiguang Li, Quanfei Huang |
| Abstract |
Next-generation-sequencing (NGS) technologies combined with a classic DNA barcoding approach have enabled fast and credible measurement for biodiversity of mixed environmental samples. However, the PCR amplification involved in nearly all existing NGS protocols inevitably introduces taxonomic biases. In the present study, we developed new Illumina pipelines without PCR amplifications to analyze terrestrial arthropod communities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 351 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 26% |
| Researcher | 89 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 211 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 50 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,044,424
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#156
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,454
of 214,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.