You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-9-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Łukasz Łuczaj, Piotr Köhler, Ewa Pirożnikow, Maja Graniszewska, Andrea Pieroni, Tanya Gervasi |
| Abstract |
Belarus is an Eastern European country, which has been little studied ethnobotanically. The aim of the study was to compare largely unpublished 19th century sources with more contemporary data on the use of wild food plants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,226,416
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#106
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,309
of 203,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.