You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise in children with joint hypermobility syndrome and knee pain: a randomised controlled trial comparing exercise into hypermobile versus neutral knee extension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Rheumatology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1546-0096-11-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Verity Pacey, Louise Tofts, Roger D Adams, Craig F Munns, Leslie L Nicholson |
| Abstract |
Knee pain in children with Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (JHS) is traditionally managed with exercise, however the supporting evidence for this is scarce. No trial has previously examined whether exercising to neutral or into the hypermobile range affects outcomes. This study aimed to (i) determine if a physiotherapist-prescribed exercise programme focused on knee joint strength and control is effective in reducing knee pain in children with JHS compared to no treatment, and (ii) whether the range in which these exercises are performed affects outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 46% |
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,366,279
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#24
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,584
of 196,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them