You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strength gain through eccentric isotonic training without changes in clinical signs or blood markers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-328 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thâmara Alves, Flávia A Guarnier, Fernanda AS Campoy, Mariana O Gois, Maíra C Albuquerque, Patrícia M Seraphim, Jayme Junior Netto, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei, Carlos R Padovani, Rubens Cecchini, Carlos Marcelo Pastre |
| Abstract |
Localized exercises are widely used in rehabilitation processes. The predominant options are exercises with an emphasis on either concentric or eccentric contractions. Eccentric exercises promote greater strength gains compared to classical concentric stimuli, but can cause muscle damage. The aim of present study was to compare strength training composed of 10 sessions with progressive loads between groups with a predominance of concentric versus eccentric contraction through an analysis of isotonic strength, pressure pain threshold, creatine kinase, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and cortisol. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Malta | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,157,439
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,099
of 4,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,182
of 313,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.